20231022S-WB-hunt-5-notes

If the meeting was about contaminated land, why was the Contaminated Land Officer not there?

Has the recent chemical testing document be scrutinised by the CLO?

Unless satisfactory answers can be provided to the 5 questions asked then it must be accepted that NPTC are supporting the past present and future corporate manslaughter of Glynneath residents.

Apart from the first question which they have failed to answer previously, all the other questions relate to a planning application passed in March 2021 and information relating to a current planning application. 

What toxicology qualifications have they got. 

Isn't this why your scrutiny committee exists?

How do they know the contaminants are safe if the site has never been fully tested and they do not have the relevant qualifications to determine this. There are no relevant qualifications that can determine whether or not the site is a safe site because the human race has not yet evolved to understand such issues.

If you believe these public officials are hiding contamination issues then you have a duty of care to refer this to a regulatory authority (The Auditor General for Wales) as defined by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1988, part 43b (1) (a, b, d, e & f, ).

https://www.audit.wales/whistleblowing - GUIDE CLICK HERE