|
0.00
|
CPC |
open meeting - CWP in foreground
00.24 marked for approval
00.36 literature (COD doc)
|
|
0.50
|
SBP |
Ref COD
|
|
1.27
|
CPC |
asks SBP how he knew the COD was
from me.
|
|
1.35
|
SBP |
says by email and that all of the
matters were included in doc "everything within the
submissions"
2.22 CWP good image
|
|
2.17
|
CPC |
carry on
|
|
2.18
|
SBP |
presentation
|
|
2.25
|
CPC |
COD to be taken into consideration
|
|
2.33
|
SBP |
presentation
7.52 - all of their concerns have been summarised
8.10 Jeremy Miles
8.18 local councillors DMP SKI - extensive on-going
discussions with the ward members
8.40 support for residential - acceptance of the extant
planning permission
10.20 stock pile brought on necessary for the approval (last
approval 2010) link with photo of tip 2015
11.15 - material brought off the site.
levels
17.20 culverting the stream - normally wouldn't do this
17.50 contam land - amendment sheet - steve hunt - mentions
me - then mo - amendment response through mo - no objections on
contam (from where)
19.05- conditions
19.50 concerns and what has been brought onto the site
20.10 - no evidence
20.25 - conditions again
20.50 - not heavily contaiminated - quite to the contrary
- that should be drawing red flags 21.10 human
health - no objections - pollution control officer no
reasonable grounds to object re land contam no open spaces -
not appropriate 21.59 approve with conditions
|
|
22.22
|
CPC |
take over - welcome to Ceri Morris,
DPR, GJP
DMP cut short - early exit
|
|
23.16
|
DPR |
DPR representation -
landfill site - a rubbish tip
24.12 enzo mention & trees
24.25 - COD report -
24.33 - PCO stamp PDE malpratice
25.14 - document withdrawn
26.00 - 2-8 brynhyfryd
asked again to rubber stamp malpratice
26.33 - cuddy group never intended to build
|
|
28.40
|
CPC |
open with my comments - personal
opinions - come back at the end to me
|
|
29.30
|
GJP |
reading off a prepared document
not comment on DPR integrity because integrity is not a planning matter
31.46 - further conditions to be imposed
32.30 - not at risk of flooding
33.05 - land contamination - extensive & thorough reports
have taken place at the site historically. These can be relied
upon, but not withstanding that, have been further updated and
reassessed in considerable detail.
The site has an extant planning permission which resulted in
a significant volume of fill material being imported with
changed site levels, this material however will be removed from
the site. Extensive dialogue has taken place between the
applicants advisors and the contaminated land officers and this
matter can be adequately dealt with and mitigated
|
|
34.03
|
CPC |
hand over to Del
|
|
34.32
|
DMP |
submission
|
|
38.07
|
CPC |
hand over to SBP does he want to
make any comment
|
|
38.23
|
SBP |
come back later - trees TPO prior
to any planning approval being given
|
|
42.22
|
CPC |
hand over to SKI
|
|
42.40
|
SKI |
extensive discussions
over the last 12-18 months
concern over potential tipping of chemical waste
3.45 - additional ground surveys done to unserstand what is
at the site
44.00 - talk to Enzo on site and phone
45.50 surveys since 2010
|
|
46.53
|
CPC |
hand over to Bamsey
|
|
47.20
|
Bamsey |
support members &
in particular possible contamination
|
|
47.56
|
CPC |
complete chemical
survey in conditions, hand over to MMC
|
|
48.24
|
SKH |
butts in and thanks
DMP & SKI, plus SBP & CMP for his pre-questions report
and their responses and he wants to ask Mo if the conditions are
robust enough to alleviate the concerns of the people living
there from flooding.
Contamination - he's not going to judge anybody - previous
developers - he thinks it very important that we understand - Mo
wouldn't have the answers. We do need to know exactly - not just
for the residents but for the environment.
We have all been told the environment is so important so
anything that is on that site we really need to be made aware of
so we as members know what to do today when we vote.
|
|
51.05
|
CPC |
apologies to SKH
|
|
51.23
|
MMC |
52.00 - full history of
the site
52-38 fully characterise the site recommended for human
health that councillor SKH has mentioned
|
|
53.36
|
CPC |
hand over to
|
|
53.50
|
SKH |
his concern is that
the Cuddy Group fill was not monitored.
We really do not understand what might be on the site.
Happy if DMP & SKI - bumbling
|
|
54.48
|
CPC |
hand over
|
|
54.56
|
SKI |
|
|
54.57
|
CPC |
summuarising MMC - Mo
needs to be satisfied before building work could commence
|
|
55.26
|
MMC |
confirming CPC summary
|
|
55.32
|
SKI |
NPT close off all of
the issues and concerns - ne being ground contaminants
56.05 - plateau cut and filled - excavated and spread - and
then test - if ground has carcinogenics
|
|
56.40
|
CPC |
hand over
|
|
56.55
|
DMP |
testing at all levels
57.05 - pleased to see current plan proposes to take away the
bulk of the spoil heap which is a new thing for years we've
expected that mountain to remain there which is crazy
|
|
57.38
|
CPC |
hand over - SBP SPL AWL
waiting to speak - Tammie Davies excahnge & Bamsey come back
-
|
|
58.20
|
Bamsey |
Condition 39 -
cxoncerned about the workers - struggling to find a condition -
testing prior to work
|
|
59.16
|
CPC |
hand over
|
|
59.20
|
SPB |
Cond 36 - and the
conditions - MMC needs the full picture - HAPPY
|
|
61.04
|
Bamsey |
happy
|
|
61.06
|
CPC |
explain Cond 39
|
|
61.15
|
SBP |
taken off site -
licence - NRW misrep - Enzo shared info - not a matter for
planning to worry about -
|
|
61.59
|
CPC |
hand over
|
|
62.03
|
SPL |
Sean Pursey Labour runs
through and explains the conditions - he mentions
remediation
|
|
63.50
|
CPC |
addresses SKH and hand
over
|
|
64.33
|
AWL |
COD - land
contamination - obtained legal advice about the document Council
of Death
(filmed from the Council YouTube Channel - https://youtu.be/d7LwpVlT4q4
- he starts his rep at 1.55.00)
|
|
66.57
|
CPC |
hand over
|
|
67.09
|
MMC |
dev issue
whatever material is on site is suitable for use
|
|
67.46
|
CPC MMO |
Financial implications
- do it to my satisfaction - exchange about remediation
|
|
68.20
|
AWL |
happy but if low levels
are contam then it would make sense to remove it
|
|
68.50
|
CPC |
clear of contamiants to
MMC satisfaction
Enzo won't be able to build unless MMO satisfied
|
|
69.30
|
SBP |
NRW misrepresentation -
inert - allegations - definitely unproven - developer will do
the right thing -
|
|
70.49
|
CPC |
hand over
|
|
70.53
|
Cllr Mizen |
mentions MMO DMP &
SKI and welcomes their stance
|
|
71.30
|
CPC |
|
|
71.54
|
SKH |
flooding - musn't make
mistake - pipes not adequate enough
73.16 - CPC hand over
|
|
73.20
|
DMP |
flooding - extant -
surface drainage
CPC hand over
|
|
74.05
|
SBP |
Terry Davies intro -
TAM 15 - mentions SKH -
CPC hand over
|
|
75.15
|
TDD |
flooding issues -
technical detail of culvert to be decided by Ordinary Water
Course procedure. 1 in 100 + 30% event1.17.35 - close to DPR
property. Greenfield run off
|
|
78.40
|
CPC |
on chat, a discussion
between DPR and SBP - CPC mentions me
|
|
79.21
|
SKH |
asks about SARS
CPC hand over
|
|
80.18
|
TDD |
reply about SARBS
CPC hand over
|
|
80.37
|
SKH |
more flooding
|
|
81.23
|
CPC |
SARBS not required
|
|
81.58
|
DKL |
Focus on CPC smiling
and saying well said
|
|
82.26
|
CPC |
82.56 - summary
MMO eagle eyed
professional officers - conditions - they will be
managed
|
|
85.24
|
SKI |
Trees & section 106
CPC hand over
|
|
85.45
|
SBP |
section 106 &
CPC discuss (watch again - check notes for this exchange)
SKI good relationship in being able to talk to the developer
87.35 - trees -
90.05 - SKI running away from screen
|
|
90.13
|
CPC |
hand over - DMP thank
Terry
|
|
90.24
|
DMP |
thank for responses - 4
points
test boring - drainage - section 106 back in the 1980s one in
place £30,000 - trees
91.17 CPC hand over
|
|
91.25
|
SKI |
he's back - trees
important to residents - informal discussions with Mr John &
Mr Enzo
|
|
91.58
|
SBP |
trees - retaining trees
GJP landscaping plan
CPC hand over
|
|
93.45
|
CPL |
trees - what burden are
they putting on the developer
|
|
94.23
|
SBP |
trees and Enzo wants to
get on site ASAP - GJP remove as much burden as possible
CPC hand over
|
|
96.43
|
SPL |
trees
|
|
97.25
|
CPC SKH SBP |
SKH motion amendment to
trees or second - CPC & SBP correct wording exchange - Mike
Shaw process advice
101.10 SKH sings national anthem
|
|
101.55
|
CPC |
looking after the
residents and the trees
|
|
102.44
|
SKH |
moves for the approval
- DKL seconder
104.40 - SKH approve
104.55 - CWP approve
106.04 - Nicola Lake's contribution
|
|
|
|
|
