20230730A-WBEM-CPSE-self-defence |
20230730A-WBEM-CPSE-self-defence | CPSE GTCO SWPO NPTC | Initial Email asking CPS for the level of self defence I can use to protect my family from corrupt public officials. Follows on with an email to GTCO CWIL asking to make sure the info is retained in the GTCO records. Also sent to........... jason.evans@mediawales.co.uk |
NOTE TO CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE A situation has arisen within my community where public officials and regulatory authorities such as the police, environment agency are refusing to investigate breaches of environmental laws that has, and still is, almost certainly causing the deaths of people living within this community. These breaches are also threatening the health and the lives of myself, my family and a group of vulnerable residents who have asked me to represent them. I am reaching out to you for advice on self defence against the violent crime Corporate Manslaughter that I believe is being perpetrated by public officials against members of this community. All the elements of the offence Corporate Manslaughter as defined on the CPS website have been met, poisons have been moved and deaths have occurred that can be linked to the poisons. I believe a degree of certainty has been met allowing me to act in self defence which is also defined by your website. However, before embarking on a programme of self defence actions I would like your organisation to clarify a few points. Laws of the United Kingdom have been broken and I believe that your organisation is the definitive authority for such instances and to provide information to define public responses to such crimes. There are breaches of UK environmental laws that are being supported by and covered up by public officials, environment agencies and police officers within our local county borough. This includes our local community council to include the Glynneath Town Council clerk, Ceri Willcox, to whom the second part of this email is directed. A Neath Port Talbot Council planning approval (P2020/0863) has breached the 1990 Environmental Protection Act to further increase the possibility of deaths within this community and public officials who are supporting these plans can be proven to have broken government rules to cover up this breach. They are closely linked to regulatory authorities such as the police and environment. Quite simply a whole government system now exists within our community that is designed to prevent environmental crimes being investigated and that will almost certainly cause the death of residents who live bordering a toxic waste dump. I refer specifically to the NPTC planning approval P2020/0863 which has been attached to the NPTC planning application P2021/0546 which allows the movement of over 20,000 tons of toxic waste towards, and next to residents properties. The spoil heap to which P2020/0863 refers has been tested and found to be contaminated three times and so when the developer moves this spoil towards residents properties he will be breaking the 1974 Control of Pollution Act. At this point a major environmental law will be broken that may affect the health of my family and I will undertake an action of self-defence to protect them. The purpose of this email is to establish the level of self
defence against persons or property I can make to prevent these
poisons being moved towards my family home and the homes of
others. I will use self defence against these government officials
or developer employees, as is my right to prevent what I believe
is the violent crime of Corporate Manslaughter being committed
against myself, my family and others whom I represent. I quote here from the CPS website page that includes this information: "Self-Defence and the Prevention of Crime This section offers guidance of general application to all offences susceptible to the defences of: self defence; "Self defence and the prevention of crime originates from a number of different sources. Defence of the person is governed by the common law. Defence of property however, is governed by the Criminal Damage Act 1971. Arrest and the prevention of crime are governed by the Criminal Law Act 1967. This guidance is particularly relevant to offences against the person and homicide, and prosecutors should refer to
Offences against the Person, incorporating the charging standard, elsewhere in the legal guidance and Homicide, elsewhere in the legal guidance. To complicate matters, environmental crimes have already been committed that are potentially affecting families as we speak, the conditions of the NPTC planning approval P2020/0195 were broken by the developer Enzo Homes who spread and exposed toxic waste on the site which was then misrepresented by a NPTC official Steve Ball. In the breach notice for Enzo, contamination was shown to be deep and only potentially affecting the groundwater by Mr Ball. However there is no evidence of deep contamination, the only evidence of toxic waste available at the time shows poisons on the surface of the site and this information was available to Mr Ball. As we speak these toxins still lay on the surface of the site and are potentially killing people as we speak. The public official to whom this email is addressed (Ceri Willcox) is aware of this and is working with other corrupt NPTC officials to prevent the exposed poisons from being dealt with as required by the council contaminated land policy or defined as is required by environmental law. Mx Willcox is almost certainly committing Corporate Manslaughter as we speak which is a violent crime. Evidence of this can be found in the following video where she infers that she is aware of the death of residents and refuses to do anything about it. Mx Willcox can be seen to be working together with the councillor Del Morgan who is named in one of the documents to which she refers as covering up toxic waste at the site. He should not be part of this discussion. He is breaking the prejudicial interest rule, a basic council rule that disallows anyone with a personal interest in a topic from taking part in a discussion. All the elements of the offence Corporate Manslaughter have been met by Glynneath Town Council on more than one occasion and poisons exist on site that can cause the death of people near by. Glynneath Town Council are a criminal organisation who are potentially causing the deaths of residents within Glynneath. This is not something that can be dragged through a legal system, because people are potentially dying as we speak and will die in the future if nothing is done. I have a duty of care to myself and my family and I will act in self defence to prevent harm from coming to them and to others in my community. It should be understood by the CPS that I am not personally threatening anyone with physical violence, I am only attempting to establish the level of self defence I can legally use in the defence of my family as defined by your organisation on your website. It is an attempt to establish a protection mechanism against corruption within the United Kingdom government system. There are people causing deaths through breaches of government protocol. It is an attempt to establish the level of self defence one is able to achieve to force public officials to follow their own government rules or to initiate an investigation by a regulatory UK government authority that ensures UK Government law is upheld by government officials or that corrupt officials are brought to account. As a former member of the United Kingdom Armed Forces I
understand that discipline is necessary and required when
undertaking actions such as self defence and I believe it is
imperative that your organisation set the level of self defence
I must adhere to whilst acting in the self defence of my family
and the residents of this area who my company have agreed to
support. Hence this request, Please identify the level of self defence I can use in self defence with regards the following situations? 1. With public officials in order to bring attention to corruption that is almost certainly killing residents bordering the site. 2. With workmen driving machines that are moving toxic waste
in the direction of my family. An alternate option I would suggest would be for the CPS to instruct that South Wales Police and Natural Resources Wales follow the required protocol in relation to reported offences and investigate crimes. If we refer again to the Neath Port Talbot Council planning
approval P2020/0863 which removed the requirement for chemical
contamination testing on over 20,000 cubic metres of previously
tested and confirmed toxic waste, that has also had eyewitness
accounts of barrels of waste being dumped there, and will be
moved closer to my family when the development recommences
thereby breaching the 1974 Control of Pollution Act. A level of
self defence needs to be established by the Crown Prosecution
Service because I WILL take action to prevent this from
happening . NOTE TO THE CPS ENDS - EMAIL TO GLYNNEATH TOWN CLERK BEGINS.................... www.dai-richards.wales |
PAGE STATUS
PAGE CREATED FOR INFORMATION ONLY | ||
information stored but not actioned | ||
Partially worked on - PICK UP INFO | ||
information analysis complete |