STEPHEN KARL HUNT - ENZO DEVELOPMENT, GLYNNEATH

date	keywords	info
April 2020		I first came across SKH when he friended me on FB in April 2020. This is just after I joint the Glynneath News and Views FB group of which he is an admin. He then proceeded to invite me to several FB groups which he had started. I joined one or two but then ignored these invites, one of which was 'Neath Consituency Voice for Everyone'.
7/9/2020 20200907	council of death document	SKH received our draft document 'Council of Death' for consideration prior to the planning committee meeting on 8/9/2020. CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE EGRAC 1990 ENVIRIONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT BREACH REPORT
8/9/2020 20200908	planning committee meeting amendment sheet question.	SKH asked the planning department a question in relation to Public Health Risk Assessments for the HYG development. The correct answer to the question was avoided using deception by the planning department.
25/10/2020 20201025	SKH FOI made	I sent emails to every member of the planning committee to ask what due diligence they have undertaken in response to the EGRAC report including Stephen K Hunt. - 20210607R-EM-20201025A-EM-PCOM-foi - CLICK HERE
2/11/2020 20201102	refusal of FOI and block	The Head of Planning and Public Protection, Ceri Morris responded to my Planning Committee emails asking for due diligence in the EGRAC Council of Death report. pdf = 20210607R-20201102A-LE-NPTC-PCOM-response - CLICK HERE
2/3/2021 20210302	Stephen Karl Hunt - SKH FB Messenger conversation 01	20211216R-hunt-FB-conversation-1 - (Introduction) I introduced myself to Stephen Karl Hunt via FB messenger in an attempt to en-list his support in fighting PD corruption. I provided links to information which he said he would look at and get back to me, he didn't.
21/6/21 20210621	Stephen K Hunt FB Messenger conversation 01	20211216R-hunt-FB-conversation-1 - (Opportunity) I resumed the conversation with Stephen Karl Hunt and included a link to the Glynneath Contamination Corruption Coalition page. This included information about the The Public Interest Disclosure Act. I stated that he had a duty to report it to his fellow councillors and ended up stating that he was morally corrupt.
13/10/21 20211013	Stephen K Hunt FB Messenger conversation 02	20211013R-FB-hunt-conversation-2 - (Opportunity accepted) I continued with the FB Private Messenger conversation with Stephen Karl Hunt and provided him with links to Planning Committee corruption YouTube videos. I referred to the fact that he was chair of the relevant scrutiny committee. The conversation continued and the next day he provided information that he had emailed the Director of the Environment Nicola Pearce and Head of Planning Ceri Morris requesting a meeting.
14/10/21	Stephen Kark Hunt to Nicola Pearce & Ceri Morris	For your information, I have sent this short email to both the Director of the Environment Nicola Pearce and Head of Planning Ceri Morris and I’m waiting for a response , thanks Steve. Dear Both I am of course aware on the longstanding matters concerning Mr Richards and the Heol Y Glyn development at Glynneath. In recent days I have been contacted by Mr Richards requesting my assistance in helping to consider matters, specifically focussing on my remit as the Chair of the Regeneration and Sustainable Development Scrutiny Committee. I am of course aware that planning applications do not fall within this area but aspects of contaminated land I understand do. I wonder therefore whether I could meet with you both to have an understanding of the issues that have developed here. It is concerning of course that Mr Richards is making strong allegations of corruption and inappropriate actions and I wish to understand the basis behind this and what as an authority we are considering. I can then perhaps determine whether there is anything specific that needs to be considered from the scrutiny perspective. I would be grateful to meet with you at your earliest convenience”. Many thanks Steve.
14/10/21		No problem and I will after the responses take it to my scrutiny committee if necessary depending on what they come back with, I have told all officers to invite NRW and Land Contamination experts to the said meeting,
5/11/21 20221105 QUOTE		Following the meeting with the planning officials SKH stated. "I’m waiting for full response from them currently and will give you a copy, what I have written here is my take on how the meeting went with honesty , they might even dispute my findings but I like you would not want anyone’s health to be put at risk with any contamination that is a health hazard on that site. I’m also aware and mentioned Cuddy and his way of working during the site in question but I haven’t any proof of that of course, I also for your information that they are well aware of and that was Howard Rees and contamination of the land by him in Rheola , they all went quiet then, but stated they are aware of that situation and speaking to the possible developer at that site to deal with contamination there also, but again stating that it doesn’t always be needed to be removed. I’m sorry this isn’t more positive information, but I will continue in my capacity to make sure the site in question does not cause any health problems for you or the residents living close to the site, I am a one man band however and not sure how much influence I have on this local authority I’m sorry to say."
29/10/21 20211019	Stephen K Hunt	Questions for Steve Hunt to ask. 1. initial thoughts 2. plan & process 3.pre submission - contains the basis of the corruption indicators for the chem testing info 4-pre-final-submission 5-layout-for-web & pdf 6-pdf-sent-to-skh CLICK HERE FOR THE QUESTIONS STEVE HUNT ASKED ON OUR BEHALF
21/12/21 20211221	Stephen K Hunt FB Messenger conversation 03	202111216R-WB-hunt-FB-conversation-3 - (Pressure) I didn't hear back from Stephen Karl Hunt following his meeting with the PD. It turned out that they refused to answer any questions. I had to nudge him twice for replies and then told him on the third message that I was moving on with the info provided. (Reply received later that day stating he'd asked in an on-line council public meeting why he hadn't received the answers to his questions.)
24/1/22
31/1/22		response from Steve Hunt with cut and paste information from the Head of Planning. 202111216R-WB-hunt-FB-conversation-3
1/3/22	FB Messenger conversation 03	20220301A-EM-RREL-SKHU-questions - Replied to SKH and requested that he investigate chemical testing info and provide a HHRA from the planning dept.
27/8/22 20220827		20220827R-WB-RICD-SKHU-complete - Complete exchange with SKH in relation to the 5 questions for the Head of Planning.
20221107A-WBPM-DRIC-SKHU-knoyle	SKHU	Private Message on FB to SKHU in relation to SKNO mental post.
20/12/23		REPORT TO POLICE OF THE NPT COUNCIL LEADER, STEPHEN KARL HUNT COVERING UP NPTC PLANNING DEPARTMENT CORRUPTION THAT HAS POTENTIALLY CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE ACTRESS RUTH MADOC AND HER HUSBAND JOHN JACKSON. CLICK HERE
END

The fact that he's getting the run around and that they are refusing to answer relevant questions should tell him something. The reason why they are doing this is because he is doing his job and supporting the community. Normally his role when dealing with these officers in relation to a planning application is as a committee member His role there is to work together with the CS to regulate authority business, the CS have already prepared information which they present. In effect what has happened in his meeting with the CS is that he is being treated like a member of the public because that's who he is representing. The planning cartel are refusing to work with you because you are advocating for the public. They have a hold on you because you have already supported the potential corporate manslaughter of Glynneath residents twice. The first time is when you voted to support them in the planning meeting of P2020/0195 ignoring the concerns of the public and the second was when you refused to undertake due diligence and referred the 'Council of Death' document back to Ceri Morris. On these occasions you fell in

The reason this

The reason you felt helpless and to use your terminology 'a one man band' is because you've met them on their home turf where your side is inferior in numbers, it was a case of you against them. To use a sporting analogy you are Shane Williams playing on his own against the England team. You are a brilliant player but you never get the ball and so you have no chance in achieving a fair result. The way forward for you I would suggest is to find a way turn the tables, if you are going to do it via a meeting then, many councillors, one planning department rep, one question in a recorded session. However, with these people its always best to approach them

Did you understand why I was asking the questions that I did. I did. they did, if you didn't your not going to look for the reasons why they are avoiding them. The questions I asked should have provided you with indicators that NPTC have done in the are, are currently doing so and will in the future commit the corporate manslaughter and homicide of Glynneath residents.

From here, we can go one of two ways. I support you to do the right thing and bring these people to account or I can target them through you which will cause you problems. I would prefer the former because of the NPTC politicians in this process you have shown the greatest level of care for our community. But at the end of the day, the safety of my family is of paramount importance and I will use any means possible to protect them.

page 17 provides a list of issues that can be reported to include two relevant to the hidden information:

Health and safety risks, either to the public or other employees;

Any deliberate concealment of information tending to show any of the above.

NPTCBC Constitution - Article 6 - (Scrutiny) General (e)

(e) To make reports or recommendations to the authority or the executive on matters which affect the authority’s area or the inhabitants of that area.

Read ombud page again

ombudsman - no

He should consider PIDA - If you believe these public officials are hiding contamination issues then you have a duty of care to refer this to a regulatory authority (The Auditor General for Wales) as defined by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1988, part 43b (1) (a, b, d, e & f, ).

one thing to take away from this communication exchange is the information I provided him in the earlier message.

"there is toxic waste on the surface at the site that is potentially affecting people and plans have already been passed to move toxic waste closer to our houses" and the council are without a published human health risk assessment as required

KEY INFORMATION IN MAROON (bold + highlighted - give priority to actions relating to this information)